기사 메일전송
  • 기사등록 2020-10-05 17:39:48

Why the BitMEX Case Could Change the World of Finance

Anatoliy Knyazev, Co-Founder at EXANTE

The BitMEX case has shown that crypto businesses must work according to the rules of the existing financial system, as far as the US is concerned. The US authorities have made it clear that the crypto sector, including its ‘gray’ alleys, is now under control and will have to play by the rules.

New risks for the crypto currencies and exchanges

The BitMEX crypto exchange remains one of the largest venues that hasn’t required KYC. Another major exchange Binance hasn’t imposed any documentation requirements for the trades under 2 BTC. Now, it will most likely introduce mandatory KYC, regardless of volumes.  

Compared to the BitMEX case, the sluggish action of the New York Attorney Office against Bitfinex and Tether seems pretty liberal. That said, after the BitMEX events the risk has grown for Tether holders and there may be new repercussions. The authorities’ message is loud and clear - there will be no trades at decent exchanges without KYC. The control of crypto exchanges will resemble that of regular financial companies in Europe and the US.

Closure of long positions and withdrawals led to the decrease of Bitcoin quotes. However, BTC has shortly played back the drop and resumed growth. BitMEX is a big player but not the whole industry.

The other case is force majeure. An example of such force majeure would be termination of BitMEX operations and cash withdrawals. Due to huge liquidity and low commissions, the exchange has been a No. 1 platform for many arbitrageurs. If the worst came to the worst, they would get stuck and the balance of liquidity would be compromised. This would provide a negative impulse to market players and might result in a domino effect and the BTC collapse.

Why Defi won’t save the crypto world

Given the BitMEX situation, it’s obvious that crypto exchange players will either have to comply or switch to DeFi. That said, DeFi may cause potential troubles of its own. BSA (Bank Secrecy Act) is a general provision that applies to both financial companies and individuals should crypto exchange be their occupation rather than a one-time operation.

It’s crucial to understand that accusations against BitMEX build on alleged breach of a complex of rules, rather than a specific incident. Any business in the world that services (or may service) US clients and develops and markets itself in the US - may fall under these rules. The popular DeFi project Uniswap is no exception. Its developers claim that they cannot check the client’s country or perform AML according to the US laws since “it’s a smart contract”. Does it hold Defi exchanges free from liability? It probably doesn’t...

Although the Department of Justice investigates Uniswap, this doesn’t mean they will arrest smart contracts. However, there are always people who develop software, appstore apps or do marketing. The US laws, BSA in particular, can make these people liable.

In the worst case scenario, we’ll be left with a ‘stripped down’ smart contract that we might use directly. In practice, 99% of current users will ditch it with the absence of applications and marketing. We witnessed this happening with decentralized exchange Etherdelta whose creator and website admin had got heavily fined.

All are equal under the law, yet some are more equal

The feasibility of new cases is an open question. The BitMEX exchange has been the most prominent and most unregulated in the recent years. Others were either smaller or more controllable. Most exchanges play by the rules of the existing financial system. They yield money for the state and raise no concerns for the US monetary control. The BitMEX’s case may have been aggravated by the company’s intention to sneak out of the US jurisdiction to the Seychelles and compromise with the local authorities. Don’t be misled: the US authorities are always on the alert. 

It’s of utmost importance that the Department of Justice and CFTC came after private individuals. They were not charged with terrorism, yet the sentence matched one suitable for a criminal, rather than administrative offense as it was in the TON case. The BitMEX management now faces up to five years in jail.

Global banks often find themselves in the middle of an AML scandal. They have to pay their fines, yet there are no individual top managers among the defendants. Like Orwell wrote: “All are equal, but some are more equal than others.” Looks like it’s the banks that are ‘more equal’ now.

ⓒ 4차산업혁명의 중심기술 블록체인밸리(Blockchain Valley), 블록타임스TV


다른 곳에 퍼가실 때는 아래 고유 링크 주소를 출처로 사용해주세요.

기사본문 하단배너 이미지(채널)_2-1번…
 ▷ Blockchain Leaders 더보기
▷ Popular articles더보기
  1. 코어닥스, 핀마트와 업무협약으로 가상자산 대출 서비스 첫발 코어닥스, 핀마트와 업무협약으로 가상자산 대출 서비스 첫발 프리미엄 디지털 자산 거래소 코어닥스와 금융정보 비교 핀테크 기업 핀마트가 업무협약을 맺고 가상자산(디지털 자산) 대출 서비스의 첫발을 내디뎠다. 코어닥스는 증권사에 공급하던 금융IT 솔루션을 바탕으로 제작되어 높은 수준의 보안성과 서비스를 갖춘 디지털 자산 거래...
  2. 김병준 대표, “암호화폐 시장 활성화 및 인식 개선 해 나갈 것” 에이프로빗, 새 상장 서비스 ‘에이플러스’공개- ‘에이플러스’, 투자자가 다양하고 건전한 프로젝트를 접할 수 있는 기회 제공- 김병준 대표, “암호화폐 시장 활성화 및 인식 개선 해 나갈 것”블록체인 핀테크 기업 ‘에이프로코리아(대표: 김병준)’가 운영하는 디지털 자산 거래소 ‘에이프로빗(APROBIT)’ 이 25일 새로운 상장 서비스..
  3. 밀크파트너스, 블록체인 기반 소셜 노래방 앱 ‘썸씽’ 운영 기업 이멜벤처스와 MOU 체결 밀크파트너스 x 이멜벤처스, 업무협약 체결밀크파트너스, 블록체인 기반 소셜 노래방 앱 ‘썸씽’ 운영 기업 이멜벤처스와 MOU 체결블록체인 기반 포인트 통합 플랫폼 ‘밀크(MiL.k)’를 운영중인 밀크파트너스(대표 조정민)가 노래방 앱 ‘썸씽’을 전개하는 이멜벤처스(대표 김희배)와 비대면 문화 콘텐츠 확산 및 서비스 활성화를 위한 업..
  4. 가상자산 전문 기업들의 ‘2021년 가상자산 금융시장, 투자, 제도 법규’ 등 전망 ‘2021 글로벌 가상자산 금융 컨퍼런스’, 27일부터 3일간 온라인 생중계· 가상자산 전문 기업들의 ‘2021년 가상자산 금융시장, 투자, 제도 법규’ 등 전망· 한국, 미국, 중국, 싱가폴, EU 등 전세계 전문가 한 자리에 모여 발전방향 제시전세계 가상자산 금융 각 분야 전문 기업들이 모여 2021년 글로벌 가상자산 시장을 전망하는 2021 글로벌 ...
  5. 플라이빗, 가상자산 및 예금 실사보고서 공개 플라이빗, 가상자산 및 예금 실사보고서 공개 ‘고객자산 안전하다’ - 고객의 자산을 더욱 안전하고 투명하게 운영하기 위해 최선을 다할 것 [토토이코노미포스트=김민식 기자] 가상자산 거래소 플라이빗(Flybit)의 운영사 한국디지털거래소(대표 김석진, 이하 플라이빗)가 고객 신뢰도 제고와 투명한 거래환경 제공을 위해 가상자산 및 예금...
  6. 주목할 알트코인 1대1 데스매치/메이커다오vs유니스왑/엔진코인’ VS디센트럴랜드 코인/레이븐코인VS테조스 [비트… 주목할 알트코인 1대1 데스매치/메이커다오vs유니스왑/엔진코인’ VS디센트럴랜드 코인/레이븐코인VS테조스 [비트코인 다시 오늘의코인] ⓒ 4차산업혁명의 중심기술 블록체인밸리(Blockchain Valley), 블록타임스TV
모바일 버전 바로가기